Bridging the Divide Between CMOs & CIOs

In “Digital Disruption” James McQuivey makes a compelling argument that large organizations should adopt the same tools, platforms, and relationships that start-ups use to upend industry. Common tools of disruption, according to McQuivey, are mobile apps, cloud-based data storage, and software testing subscriptions.
Taking a leaf from McQuivey’s approach, this article asks the question: could a simple customer research tool help the CMO work better with the CIO and CTO?
Two Approaches to Customer Insight Development
I recently met with a CMO from a Wealth Management firm and a product lead (who reported up through the CIO) from a large healthcare company. In order to better run their business they both wanted deeper insight into customer motivation. Yet they took different approaches to achieve their goals:
The Marketing Approach
· Need: Better understand the path prospects take in becoming customers with special attention to social media and smart phone usage
· Approach name: Comms plan, a document that maps spend ratios and marketing tactics to the journey prospects take across a myriad of touchpoints
Pros
o Good data from paid media metrics
o Good insights across standard media channels such as TV, print, and web
o First couple of years the plan has even attempted to integrate the influence of peer recommendations, social media, and mobile behavior
Cons
o Report drafted by the media agency. Strong bias towards paid media
o Big data gaps in the role social media and live channel interactions have on conversion
o Reliance of focus groups vs. potentially more illuminating ethnographies
The Product Approach
· Need: Understand the ‘moments that matter’ for customer before, during, and after a doctor’s visit
· Approach name: Customer Journey Map. A common deliverable in software-driven businesses, a journey map visualizes the story of why, when, and how customers interact with the business.
Pros
o Customer-focused. Researchers study what customers say and, more importantly, do to complete the journey
o Findings often reveal potentially hidden themes such as non-linear pathways and the timeframes between touch points
o The best maps capture both the functional steps in a process AND the emotional state of the audience at each step
Cons
o Potential bias as customers rarely acknowledge the ability for marketing (advertising, DM, and brand management tactics) to influence their actions
A Unified Approach to Customer Insight Development
The ‘customer journey map’ is the tool that could unify the customer research process. It’s already adopted by product teams, UX/UI and tech organizations. The folks who need convincing of its merits are primarily the marketing organizations.
Here are three reasons the CMO should consider ‘customer journey mapping’:
1. More objectivity. Comms planning reinforces marketing’s bias for push tactics. This is a factor of incentives. These plans are usually developed by agencies (creative or media) that rely on paid media implementation for revenue. The more paid media the better. The journey map in contrast reports back what’s important to the customer. The map brings to life all the ways a prospect hears about the company, explores the offering, trials and purchases, consumes the product, and then talks about the experience.
For example, journey map work revealed that buyers of consumer electronics are significantly more influenced by online reviews than by advertising. (See the Jan 2014 HBR magazine, What Marketers Misunderstand About Online Reviews). Armed with the insight the CMO can align more spend and marketing activity on the ‘moments that matters’.
2. More insight. The traditional marketing funnel framework focuses on actions taken by the marketer. It also falsely portrays the journey as clean and linear. As noted above the customer is influenced by many things the marketer may not touch (but should). And the non-linearity of the journey isn’t something to turn a blind eye too.
For example, understanding how often a potential buyer returns to a website (and over what time frame) could significantly enhance the personalization strategy for that site: does the consumer get a different message each time? A different offer based on duration between visits?
Furthermore smartphone usage further muddies the linear framework. Is showrooming top of the funnel or bottom?
3. More data-driven. The best journey maps are rigorously defined by usage data. For start-up disruptors this means testing every new node on the map. For large organizations usage mapping is an opportunity to unearth data gaps as the customer travels between different business functions (marketing, product, live channel, service etc.) Usage data is supplemented in the journey map methodology with survey data—by asking your customers to score their experience along any number of dimensions relevant to your offering.
For example, the CMO could now learn the education content offered on the landing zone clicked too from paid search wasn’t valuable. By this stage in the journey the customer already knew the reasons to shop the category. Rather they now expected reasons to buy from the CMO’s company.
Conclusion
Large scale organizational change doesn’t come easy. But the adoption of a useful tool can sweep through a company practically overnight (see Box’smesmerizing growth). As McQuivey points out there’s nothing stopping large companies using the same tools as their disruptors. The ‘customer journey map’ is one such tool that all CMOs should be actively test driving today.
For more on journey mapping aimed at marketers: Customer Journey Mapping: 10 Tips For Beginners
Photo credit: http://bit.ly/1jt85WS

